5WPR
Get in touch

5W AI VISIBILITY INDEX · AESTHETIC MEDICINE · JUNE 2026 · PHASE 1 OF 2

The Med Spa & Aesthetic Medicine AI Visibility Index 2026

Botox owns the syringe. RealSelf owns the answer. LaserAway owns the location.

By Ronn Torossian · Founder & Chairman, 5W AI Communications · Published June 18, 2026

The Numbers

The Med Spa & Aesthetic Medicine AI Visibility Index 2026 ranks the top 25 brands in U.S. aesthetic medicine: toxins, fillers, devices, body contouring, national chains, dermatology groups, and marketplaces. Rankings are by citation share across the five major AI answer engines.

A $25 billion category.Twenty-five brands own all of it.

$25B

U.S. aesthetic medicine market in 2026

15%

CAGR — fastest-growing healthcare-adjacent category

12,000

Med spas operating across the U.S.

95%

AI citation share held by the top 25 brands

5

AI engines tracked: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews

65

Patient-intent prompts tested across all engines

Top 25 brands control 95% of all AI citation share in U.S. aesthetic medicine. The remaining 11,500 facilities — 96% of every med spa in America — split the leftover 5%. AI did not create that compression. AI exposed it.

The Index — Top 25 Brands by AI Citation Share

Citation share scores out of 100. Higher score = higher citation frequency across the five engines on category-defining patient-intent prompts. Composite of citation frequency (40%), cross-engine breadth (20%), query-type breadth (20%), source-authority weight (15%), and crawl-access (5%).

Brand universe: 92 candidate brands evaluated. The final 25 were selected by ranked composite score across the full candidate universe.

The full ranking.Scored out of 100.

01
Botox
95
02
CoolSculpting
87
03
RealSelf
86
04
Juvederm
83
05
Dysport
78
06
Restylane
77
07
LaserAway
72
08
Sculptra
69
09
Daxxify
65
10
Ideal Image
62
11
Kybella
58
12
Xeomin
56
13
Milan Laser
54
14
SkinSpirit
49
15
Sono Bello
47
16
AEDIT
44
17
Ever/Body
38
18
Schweiger Dermatology
35
19
Alchemy 43
33
20
SEV Laser
29
21
AIRE Aesthetics
25
22
U.S. Dermatology Partners
23
23
Forefront Dermatology
20
24
Skinney Medspa
17
25
Belotero
15

Color key: red — independent / marketplace / challenger brands; black — pharma-backed and PE-backed brands.

AI Citation Power Structure

Two companies own the answer.
Together: 80%.

Strip out the chains, marketplaces, and dermatology groups. Look only at the drug and device brands inside the Index. Four parent companies hold every citation. Two of them hold 80%.

Company Brands Citation Share
AbbVie / Allergan Botox, Juvederm, CoolSculpting, Kybella 47%
Galderma Dysport, Restylane, Sculptra 33%
Merz Aesthetics Xeomin, Belotero 10%
Revance Daxxify 10%

AbbVie/Allergan controls 47% of all drug and device AI citation share in aesthetic medicine. Galderma controls 33%. Together: 80%. Merz and Revance split the remaining 20%.

Every med spa in America books patients using one of four companies' molecules. AI engines reflect that concentration cleanly. The brand wars play out one tier above the clinic.

Local SEO does not equal AI visibility.

Eight Findings

What the data actually says.

80%

Finding 01 —

AbbVie and Galderma control 80% of aesthetic medicine's AI citations. Every patient asking AI about wrinkles, lines, fillers, or fat reduction is being answered through brands those two companies own.
95

Finding 02 —

Botox is the only word. AbbVie's Botox scored 95 — the highest in the Index. The drug, the brand, and the category are the same word in every AI answer about wrinkles.
86

Finding 03 —

RealSelf is the gatekeeper. Scored 86 — higher than every individual med spa, dermatology group, and device brand. When patients ask AI "is this safe?" the marketplace owns the answer.
100×

Finding 04 —

The chains are 100x outspent, and 50% less cited. LaserAway: 190+ locations, $200M+ revenue. Cited less than the combined marketing budgets of RealSelf and AEDIT. Location count and ad spend do not translate to AI citation share.
#9

Finding 05 —

Daxxify entered the chat. Revance launched Daxxify in 2023. Already ahead of Merz's Xeomin, which has been on the market for over a decade. 24 months of press beat 14 years of market presence.
5%

Finding 06 —

Independent med spas don't exist to AI. ~11,500 facilities operate below the Index. Combined citation share: under 5%. Independents either consolidate, brand-license, or disappear from AI-mediated patient research.
MD>

Finding 07 —

Dermatology groups outrank med spa chains. Schweiger (35), USDP (23), Forefront (20) all out-cited 19 of 25 ranked brands. Board-certified MD authority is the citation signal AI engines weight highest in medical categories.
0

Finding 08 —

Patients ask for outcomes, not machines. InMode, Cutera, Lutronic, BTL, Solta, Hydrafacial: every device OEM that built a brand around equipment instead of outcomes is invisible. The treatment brand wins. The machine loses.

Winners Above Their Weight · Losers Relative to Size

Citation share is supposed to track market share.
In aesthetic medicine, it doesn't.

Some brands punch above their revenue. Others punch dramatically below it. The gap is the story.

Winners Above Their Weight

BrandAI CitationRevenue / ScaleVerdict
RealSelf#3, Score 86~$50M est. privateSmaller business. Owns the gateway.
Daxxify (Revance)#9, Score 65Launched 202324-month newcomer beat 14-year incumbent.
AEDIT#16, Score 44<$20M est. privateSub-$20M marketplace beat $500M public companies.
Schweiger Dermatology#18, Score 35~$150M est. regionalMD authority > national chain footprint.
Alchemy 43#19, Score 33~$30M est. boutiquePremium founder-driven press beat scale chains.

Losers Relative to Size

BrandAI CitationRevenue / ScaleVerdict
Hydrafacial (SKIN)Outside top 25~$300M+ publicPublic company. 10,000 spas globally. Invisible to AI.
InMode (Morpheus8)Outside top 25~$500M publicBest-selling device line. Lost the patient query.
CuteraOutside top 25~$200M publicDeep device portfolio. No consumer brand presence.
Emsculpt (BTL)Outside top 25Category creatorNFL endorsements. Outrun by outcome-language queries.
Milan Laser#13, Score 54350+ locationsLargest hair-removal chain. Cited less than RealSelf.
Ideal Image#10, Score 62150+ locationsDecade of TV ad spend. Cited below RealSelf, below Daxxify.

The pattern: smaller companies that invested in earned media, schema, and third-party authority outrank larger companies that invested in TV, ad spend, and location count. Revenue scale built the first generation of aesthetic medicine winners. Citation share will build the next.

Notable Absences

Who didn't make the Index.
The more useful story.

Emsculpt (BTL Industries)

Heavy ad spend, NFL endorsements, body-sculpting category creator. Did not break top 25. Patients ask AI about "non-surgical butt lift" and "build muscle without exercise," not Emsculpt. Treatment brand beat the equipment brand.

Hydrafacial (The Beauty Health Company)

Public company. Ticker SKIN. $300M+ revenue. In roughly 10,000 spas globally. Did not break the top 25 in AI citation share. The earned-media playbook never ran. The Wikipedia entry is thin. The schema is missing. A category brand functionally invisible to LLMs.

InMode (Morpheus8, BodyTite)

Public company. ~$500M revenue. Patients ask for the outcome: skin tightening, radiofrequency microneedling. Not the device. InMode dominates clinician marketing and lost AI patient discovery.

Allergan Med Spa / Allē Loyalty

AbbVie's owned loyalty platform and proprietary clinic network. Massive consumer presence at the point of injection. Functionally invisible at the AI-discovery layer. The parent owns the molecule; the network does not own the answer.

Hims & Hers Aesthetics

Telehealth giant moving into aesthetics. The Hims/Hers parent is a highly visible DTC health brand. The aesthetics line has not yet earned independent AI citation share. Watchlist for 2027.

By Sub-Category

Seven categories.
Seven leaderboards.

Toxins

Botox 95 · Dysport 78 · Daxxify 65 · Xeomin 56

Fillers

Juvederm 83 · Restylane 77 · Sculptra 69 · Belotero 15

Body Contouring

CoolSculpting 87 · Kybella 58 · Sono Bello 47

Hair Removal Chains

LaserAway 72 · Ideal Image 62 · Milan Laser 54 · SEV Laser 29

Premium Chains

SkinSpirit 49 · Ever/Body 38 · Alchemy 43 33 · AIRE Aesthetics 25 · Skinney Medspa 17

Dermatology Groups

Schweiger Dermatology 35 · U.S. Dermatology Partners 23 · Forefront Dermatology 20

Authority Sites

RealSelf 86 · AEDIT 44

Appendix A — The Regional Layer

National brands win generic queries.
Regional players win local queries.

Aesthetic medicine is the most regional category in healthcare-adjacent consumer discovery. Patients do not fly for Botox. They drive 12 miles. The national ranking represents national citation share. The moment a patient adds a city, the answer changes.

Seven metros account for over 60% of all U.S. aesthetic medicine spend. AI engines surface a different leaderboard in each. Phase 2 will publish per-metro measured citation share.

Metro Regional Citation Leaders
South FloridaRiverchase Dermatology, Spa Botanica, Allure MedSpa
LA / Beverly HillsAlchemy 43, SEV Laser, Epione, BH Rejuvenation Center
New York MetroSkinney Medspa, Ever/Body, Smooth Synergy, Tribeca MedSpa
Dallas / Fort WorthAdvanced Skin Fitness, Aesthetica, MD Aesthetics
Phoenix / ScottsdaleBodyBeautiful, Spa Bella, Skin Phoenix
AtlantaSkinMedic, Buckhead Plastic Surgery, Ageless MD
HoustonHouston Aesthetic Center, DermSurgery Associates, Memorial Aesthetics

The Closing Argument

Three generations.
One race.

  1. The first generation of aesthetic medicine was won by whoever opened the most locations.
  2. The second generation was won by whoever spent the most on Google.
  3. The third generation is being won by whoever gets cited by AI.

The Index is the first defensible measurement of who is winning that race today. The data will change quarter to quarter. The structure will not. Two companies own the answer. One marketplace owns the gateway. Twelve thousand facilities compete for what's left.

Citation share is the new market share. In aesthetic medicine, it is also the new patient pipeline.

From Ronn Torossian, Founder & Chairman, 5W AI Communications

Ronn Torossian

Founder & Chairman · 5W AI Communications
"Botox didn't just win the AI category. It became the category. One word. Fifty years of earned authority. Every clinician blog post, every Reddit thread, every WebMD entry anchors the molecule to the outcome. That's the playbook. The brands that can't say what Botox can say — in a sentence, on a source AI actually reads — don't have a citation problem. They have a relevance problem."

Methodology

65 prompts. 5 engines.
92 brands evaluated.

Engines tracked

ChatGPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), Perplexity, Gemini (Google DeepMind), Google AI Overviews.

Prompt set

65 verbatim patient-intent queries spanning toxins, fillers, devices, body contouring, hair removal, skin treatments, location search, safety, cost, and provider selection.

Brand universe

92 candidate brands evaluated. The final 25 were selected by ranked composite score across the full candidate universe.

Scoring composite

Citation frequency 40% · Cross-engine breadth 20% · Query-type breadth 20% · Source-authority weight 15% · Crawl-access 5%.

Phase 1 / Phase 2

Phase 1 establishes the citation baseline. Phase 2 expands the dataset and validates findings across a larger prompt universe, including per-metro measured citation share for the top 7 U.S. markets. Refresh cadence: quarterly.

Sources

[1] American Med Spa Association (AmSpa) State of the Medical Spa Industry Annual Report 2024–2025; IBISWorld Medical Spas in the U.S. Market Research Report 2025; Allied Market Research U.S. Medical Spa Market Analysis 2025–2030.

[2] American Med Spa Association (AmSpa) Annual Industry Survey; Grand View Research U.S. Medical Spa Market Size Report 2025.

Brand revenue and footprint figures sourced from public 10-K filings, S-1 filings, private-equity portfolio disclosures, and trade press coverage in 2025–2026. Private-company revenue figures are estimates.

Does your brand have an AI citation problem?

About the Author

Ronn Torossian is the founder and chairman of 5W AI Communications, the AI Communications Firm. He is the publisher of Everything-PR and the author of two best-selling editions of For Immediate Release.

About 5W

5W is the AI Communications Firm, building brand authority across the platforms where decisions now happen: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, alongside earned media, digital, and influencer channels. 5W combines public relations, digital marketing, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), and proprietary AI visibility research to help clients measure and grow their presence in AI-driven buyer research. Founded in 2003. Learn more at 5wpr.com.

5W White Logo
EXPLORE
FOLLOW US

Full report

Read the PDF

Download PDF

Get in touch

Let's build your next chapter.

Tell us what you're working on. A senior strategist will respond within one business day.

Email
info@5wpr.com
Phone
212.999.5585
Address
469 7th Avenue, Floor 8, New York, NY 10018