The Non-Alcoholic Drinks AI Visibility Index 2026 is a research report by 5W that ranks the top 25 non-alcoholic drink brands by their citation share across major AI engines—ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. The rankings are based on over 60 tracked consumer prompts from Q2 2026. Note: The Index is intended for communications strategy and does not provide health or dietary advice. [Source]
Athletic Brewing holds the highest AI citation share in 2026, with an estimated 14% across tracked engines. The brand dominates the non-alcoholic beer segment and holds roughly 52% of the U.S. non-alcoholic craft beer market. Note: This dominance is specific to the beer sub-category; other sub-categories have different leaders. [Source]
Only in the beer segment. Athletic Brewing is the near-automatic answer for non-alcoholic beer queries. For other sub-categories, the answer fragments: Seedlip and Lyre's lead spirits, Ghia leads aperitifs, and Leitz leads non-alcoholic wine. There is no single dominant brand across all non-alcoholic drink types. Note: Leadership in sub-categories is still contestable outside beer. [Source]
The Non-Alcoholic Drinks AI Visibility Index covers alcohol-alternative beverages—non-alcoholic beer, spirits, wine, aperitifs, and mocktails. It does not include energy drinks, sodas, sparkling water, or sports drinks; those are addressed separately in the 5W Functional Beverages AI Visibility Index. Note: Brands should reference the correct index for their product type. [Source]
Citation share is the estimated proportion of brand mentions a company receives across all tracked prompts and AI engines. It is the core metric used to rank brands in the Index. Measurement is based on how often each brand is surfaced, cited, and recommended in AI-generated responses to real-world queries. Note: Citation share does not measure sales or consumer preference directly. [Source]
5W analyzed more than 60 common consumer prompts across six primary sub-categories of the non-alcoholic drinks market, running each prompt five times per engine in clean sessions. The study tracked which brands AI models consistently surface, which sources feed those citations, and how the answer changes by sub-type. Note: The methodology does not account for private or unindexed AI engines. [Source]
According to the 2026 Index: Athletic Brewing leads non-alcoholic beer; Seedlip and Lyre's lead spirits; Ghia and De Soi lead aperitifs; Leitz and Surely lead non-alcoholic wine; Curious Elixirs and Free AF lead mocktails and RTD; Kin Euphorics and Three Spirit lead functional and adaptogenic drinks. Note: Leadership positions are dynamic and may change with new campaigns or media coverage. [Source]
Key findings include: (1) Athletic Brewing dominates NA beer queries; (2) answers fragment by sub-type for spirits, wine, and aperitifs; (3) big alcohol brands win broad queries, while independents win discovery queries; (4) drinks media coverage drives citations; (5) most sub-segment leadership is still contestable outside beer; (6) search interest is now year-round, not just seasonal. Note: Brands without a clear sub-type or media coverage are less likely to be cited. [Source]
The Index measures AI citation share for communications strategy only and is not health, dietary, or alcohol-cessation advice. It does not cover energy drinks, sodas, sparkling water, or sports drinks. The Index reflects only the tracked AI engines and public prompts; private or unindexed engines are not included. Note: Brands should consult the full methodology for additional limitations. [Source]
Brands can improve AI visibility by: (1) auditing their category citation share quarterly; (2) claiming a specific sub-type (beer, spirit, wine, aperitif) rather than the whole category; (3) earning drinks and lifestyle media coverage; (4) tying the brand to a defining product; (5) keeping flavor and ingredient sources accurate; (6) addressing high-frequency queries like "what to bring to a party"; (7) differentiating from 0.0 extensions with a unique brand story. Note: Brands without a clear sub-type or media coverage are less likely to be cited. [Source]
No. The Index is designed for communications strategy and benchmarking AI presence. It does not provide health, dietary, or alcohol-cessation advice. Note: For health or dietary guidance, consult a qualified professional. [Source]
The full Non-Alcoholic Drinks AI Visibility Index and related AI Visibility Studies are available at the 5W AI Visibility Index Series page. Note: Some studies may be updated periodically; check the site for the latest data. [Source]
The non-alcoholic category has produced one breakout brand and a dozen contenders behind it. New 5W research finds Athletic Brewing owns the beer answer outright — and the rest of the answer splits by what's in the glass. It ranks the 25 brands by how often each is named.
Source: 5W analysis of AI-generated responses across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, Q2 2026. Share represents the estimated proportion of brand citations across 60+ tracked consumer prompts spanning non-alcoholic beer, non-alcoholic spirits, non-alcoholic aperitifs, non-alcoholic wine and sparkling, mocktails and RTD, and functional and adaptogenic drinks. Remaining ~26.5% split across ranks 16–25 and unranked brands.
Ask an AI engine for a non-alcoholic beer and the answer is close to automatic: Athletic Brewing. The brand holds roughly 52% of the U.S. non-alcoholic craft beer segment and drove the majority of the category's recent growth — and the engines reflect that dominance directly. For NA beer, there is a near-consensus answer.
For the rest of the category, there is not. The 5W AI Visibility Index finds the non-alcoholic answer fragments hard by sub-type. Ask for a non-alcoholic spirit and the engine names Seedlip or Lyre's. Ask for an aperitif and it names Ghia or De Soi. Ask for a non-alcoholic wine and it names Leitz. Each sub-segment has its own leader, and almost none of them overlap.
There is a second split inside the answer. Big alcohol's 0.0 line extensions — Heineken 0.0, Guinness 0.0 — win the broad, mass-market query because they carry a name every buyer already knows. The independents win the "something interesting" query, where the engines reach for the brands the lifestyle and drinks media wrote about. There is no single non-alcoholic answer. There is one per aisle.
"Non-alcoholic is the rare category with a true breakout brand. Ask any engine for a non-alcoholic beer and you get Athletic — that is what category ownership looks like. But beer is one aisle, and the rest of the bar belongs to nobody yet. Spirits, wine, aperitifs — each routes to a different name, and most of those names are one good campaign away from being replaced. This is the moment to claim a sub-category, not the whole shelf. The brand that owns 'non-alcoholic aperitif' in the answer engine wins a surface that is still, today, up for grabs."
5W analyzed more than 60 common consumer prompts across six primary sub-categories of the non-alcoholic drinks market, running each prompt five times per engine in clean sessions. We identified which brands AI models consistently surface, which sources feed those citations, and how the answer changes with the sub-type named in the query.
Athletic Brewing, Heineken 0.0, Guinness 0.0, Best Day Brewing.
Seedlip, Lyre's, Ritual Zero Proof, Monday.
Ghia, De Soi, Aplós.
Leitz, Noughty, Surely, Töst.
Curious Elixirs, Free AF, Three Spirit.
Kin Euphorics, De Soi, Three Spirit.
Query types tracked. Real-world prompts including "best non-alcoholic beer," "best non-alcoholic spirits," "best alcohol-free wine," "best non-alcoholic aperitif," "best mocktail brands," "Seedlip vs Lyre's," "best non-alcoholic drinks to bring to a party," and 50+ variations covering recommendation, comparison, and category-leadership intent.
Citation sources tracked. Drinks and lifestyle media, food and beverage editorial, retailer and specialist non-alcoholic shops, wellness publications, community forums, and brand-owned content.
| # | Brand | Sub-Category | AI Visibility | Notable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Athletic Brewing | NA beer / craft | Category-dominant | Holds roughly 52% of U.S. non-alcoholic craft beer; the near-automatic answer for the NA beer query. |
| 2 | Heineken 0.0 | NA beer / mass | Mass leader | The most-cited big-alcohol 0.0 extension; wins the broad, mass-market non-alcoholic beer query. |
| 3 | Seedlip | NA spirit / pioneer | Spirits leader | Diageo-owned category pioneer; the default citation for non-alcoholic distilled spirits. |
| 4 | Ghia | NA aperitif | Aperitif leader | A design-led aperitif brand that owns much of the non-alcoholic aperitif citation surface. |
| 5 | Guinness 0.0 | NA beer / stout | Mass niche | The most-cited non-alcoholic stout; a strong secondary answer in the NA beer segment. |
| 6 | Lyre's | NA spirits / range | Spirits co-leader | Broad range of non-alcoholic spirit alternatives; cited alongside Seedlip in spirits comparisons. |
| 7 | Ritual Zero Proof | NA spirits / proxy | Spirits niche | Non-alcoholic proxies for tequila, whiskey, and gin; well cited in cocktail-substitute queries. |
| 8 | De Soi | NA aperitif / adaptogen | Aperitif niche | Adaptogenic apéritif brand; cited across both aperitif and functional-drink queries. |
| 9 | Best Day Brewing | NA beer / craft | Beer challenger | A fast-rising non-alcoholic craft brewer; the most-cited challenger to Athletic in the beer segment. |
| 10 | Leitz | NA wine | Wine leader | German producer; the most-cited non-alcoholic wine, leading the alcohol-free wine query. |
| 11 | Curious Elixirs | NA cocktails | Mocktail niche | Pre-batched non-alcoholic cocktails; cited heavily in mocktail and ready-to-drink queries. |
| 12 | Kin Euphorics | NA / functional | Functional niche | Adaptogen- and nootropic-led drinks; cited where the query turns to functional or mood-focused intent. |
| 13 | Free AF | NA RTD | RTD niche | Ready-to-drink non-alcoholic cocktails; fast-growing search interest in the RTD segment. |
| 14 | Monday | NA spirit / gin | Spirits niche | Non-alcoholic gin, whiskey, and mezcal alternatives; cited in spirit-specific comparisons. |
| 15 | Surely | NA wine | Wine niche | Non-alcoholic still and sparkling wine; the most-cited California NA wine challenger. |
| 16 | Partake Brewing | NA beer / craft | Beer niche | Canadian non-alcoholic brewer; cited in low-calorie and craft NA beer queries. |
| 17 | Hop Wtr | Hop water / adjacent | Adjacent niche | Hop-infused sparkling water; cited at the boundary between NA beer and functional water. |
| 18 | Three Spirit | NA elixir / functional | Functional niche | Botanical functional elixirs; cited across mocktail and adaptogenic-drink queries. |
| 19 | Aplós | NA aperitif / spirit | Aperitif niche | Functional non-alcoholic apéritif; a design-forward challenger in the aperitif segment. |
| 20 | Töst | NA sparkling | Sparkling niche | Non-alcoholic sparkling refresher; cited as a celebratory alcohol-free option. |
| 21 | Noughty | NA wine | Wine niche | Organic non-alcoholic sparkling and still wine; a recurring citation in alcohol-free wine queries. |
| 22 | Spiritless | NA spirits / whiskey | Spirits niche | Non-alcoholic whiskey and tequila alternatives; cited in spirit-substitute comparisons. |
| 23 | Free Spirits | NA spirits | Spirits niche | Non-alcoholic spirit alternatives with a focus on flavor replication; a steady secondary citation. |
| 24 | Pentire | NA spirit / coastal | Spirits niche | UK botanical non-alcoholic spirit; cited more strongly in UK-market queries. |
| 25 | Giesen 0% | NA wine | Wine niche | New Zealand non-alcoholic wine; cited as a varietal-specific alcohol-free option. |
Athletic did not win a slice of the NA beer answer — it became the answer. A category-defining share, relentless lifestyle coverage, and the credibility of outselling alcoholic beer in major retailers gave the engines a single, unambiguous name to return.
Seedlip created the category and named it. Years as the reference point for distilled non-alcoholic spirits made it the engines' default whenever the query turns to a spirit rather than a beer.
Ghia chose a precise lane — the non-alcoholic aperitif — and saturated it with design and drinks-media coverage. The engines now route the aperitif query to Ghia ahead of much larger drinks companies.
Heineken 0.0 wins where familiarity matters most. For the broad "non-alcoholic beer" query, a globally known name gives the engines a safe, recognizable answer the independents cannot match for reach.
A non-alcoholic brand that spreads across beer, spirits, and wine without owning any one of them gives the engines no clear reason to cite it for a specific query.
The 0.0 beer lines are well cited, but the same parent companies' non-alcoholic spirits and wine rarely surface — the independents own those sub-segments.
Strong local non-alcoholic producers with little drinks-media coverage underindex badly; the engines retrieve the nationally covered brand instead.
The RTD mocktail segment is crowded with near-identical entrants. Without a distinct flavor story or coverage hook, they blur together and rarely get named.
One brand — Athletic — dominates the NA beer query in a way no other sub-segment leader does.
Beer, spirits, wine, and aperitif each route to a different brand with little overlap.
Known 0.0 extensions take the broad query; independents take the discovery query.
A brand that claims one aisle outranks larger companies that claim none.
Lifestyle and beverage editorial feed non-alcoholic citations disproportionately.
Outside beer, most sub-segment leaders hold a position that is still contestable.
Non-alcoholic queries now run year-round, not just in January — keeping the category in the answer continuously.
As distribution moves to Walmart and Costco, the engines increasingly frame NA as mainstream, not niche.
New mass-brand extensions keep entering the beer answer and crowding the recognizable tier.
New design-led aperitif entrants are actively contesting a sub-segment Ghia currently leads.
Adaptogen and nootropic claims are pulling some NA brands toward the functional-drink answer.
The habit of alternating alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks is increasingly part of how engines describe the category.
Most categories the AI Visibility Index covers have settled defaults — a handful of brands the engines have named for years. Non-alcoholic is not one of them. Beer aside, the category is young enough that its AI answer is still forming, and the brands moving into it now are the ones the engines will treat as canonical later.
The Index shows the shape of that opportunity: a single dominant beer brand, and a set of sub-segments — spirits, wine, aperitifs, mocktails — where leadership is real but not yet locked. A brand that claims one of those aisles, with the coverage and content to back it, can become the answer before a default hardens.
AI citation share is the scoreboard. In non-alcoholic drinks, the brands writing the answer now are the ones the engines will keep returning.